Burke Ramsey Says DNA Is the Best Chance to Solve JonBenét’s Murder

Nearly three decades after his six-year-old sister was killed, Burke Ramsey is pointing to forensic science as the most promising route to resolving the JonBenét Ramsey murder. In a rare interview with the Daily Mail published Nov. 5, the 39-year-old said DNA from an unidentified man found on JonBenét’s underwear and beneath her fingernails remains the strongest piece of evidence in the long-unsolved case.

Burke, who was nine when JonBenét was reported missing from the family’s Colorado home on Dec. 26, 1996, said the sample needs to be matched. He described the unknown male as the likely perpetrator and said finding a match would be a major step toward justice. Burke also acknowledged that the scientific details are difficult for him to follow and that studying the case is emotionally draining, but he called for the samples to be sent to additional laboratories for further testing.

A Decades-Old Mystery

Article image

JonBenét’s body was found in the basement of the family home after her mother, Patsy Ramsey, called 911 to report a kidnapping. Her death was ruled asphyxia by strangulation, with blunt head trauma also cited. The case drew intense public scrutiny and remains a subject of widespread fascination.

In 2003, Burke and his parents, John Bennett Ramsey and the late Patsy Ramsey, were excluded as contributors to the unknown DNA found on JonBenét. Burke has faced numerous online theories over the years, and he and his family have consistently denied any involvement in his sister’s death.

John Ramsey, now 82, has said in the past that the DNA had not been tested. He has also pointed to a handwritten ransom note demanding $118,000, found in the home on the day of JonBenét’s disappearance, as a significant clue. In a 20/20 interview unearthed in 2024, John suggested the figure was close to the net amount of a bonus he had received that year and said only the killer knows what the number means.

Early Investigative Missteps

The investigation was complicated from the start. After Patsy’s 911 call at 5:52 a.m., friends of the Ramseys came to the house to offer support, and people moved through the 5,000-square-foot home before John found JonBenét’s body in the basement shortly after 1:30 p.m. Retired Boulder Police Detective Bob Whitson later said in the Netflix docuseries Cold Case: Who Killed JonBenét Ramsey that he should have cleared the scene, but at the time the situation appeared to be a legitimate kidnapping.

John has said he tried to untie the cord binding his daughter’s hands, removed duct tape from her mouth, and carried her upstairs—actions that investigators said contaminated evidence on her body, her pajamas, and the tape.

Police searched the upper levels and the basement but did not find the body until a detective suggested John conduct another sweep nearly eight hours later. The body was in a part of the basement that had once been a coal room. A retired Boulder PD commander said in the series that civilians should never conduct a search.

DNA Findings and Grand Jury

The Colorado Bureau of Investigation reported on Jan. 15, 1997, that the unidentified male DNA did not match John or Burke, who was then 10. According to John, police withheld that information from prosecutors and the public for months. Investigative reporter Paula Woodward noted in the series that the DNA results did not leak, even though other details about the case had.

In 1998, a grand jury was convened. Retired detective Lou Smit, who believed an intruder was responsible, resigned rather than participate in seeking charges against the Ramseys. District Attorney Alex Hunter announced on Oct. 13, 1999, that there was insufficient evidence to charge the Ramseys or anyone else, and he did not disclose the grand jury’s recommendation.

The indictment was unsealed in 2013, showing the grand jury had voted to indict John and Patsy on two counts each of child abuse resulting in death. The document did not accuse them of killing JonBenét but of placing her in a dangerous situation and assisting a person suspected of murder and child abuse. A grand juror later told the Boulder Daily Camera that the panel felt the adults in the house may have done something they could have prevented or could have helped her and did not.

In 2008, District Attorney Mary Lacy publicly exonerated John, Patsy, and Burke, citing new touch DNA analysis. She wrote to John that she was deeply sorry for any contribution to the public perception that he might have been involved.

Burke’s renewed call for testing comes as the case approaches its 30th anniversary, with the unknown male DNA still the central unresolved thread.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *